Introduction

Quantitative Matching of Forensic Evidence Fragments using 3D Fracture Surface Topography

Quantitative Matching of Forensic Evidence Fragments using 3D Fracture Surface Topography

Thursday, May 15, 2025 | 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM Eastern
Duration: 1 hour

Overview

Fractured fragments with jagged and irregular surfaces, discovered at crime scenes, are identified as “being a match” using comparative microscopy and physical pattern analysis. The surface topography of said fragmented pieces, as measured by 3D microscopy, is utilized to establish a quantitative basis for declaring a match, complete with quantified probability and error rates. The comparison scale is configured to capture the transition of fracture surface topography from self-affine to non-self-affine (surface roughness that is independent of the observation window). At this transitional scale, fracture surfaces display distinctive roughness characteristics, determined by intrinsic material properties, microstructure, and exposure history to environmental and external forces.  

In the case of the examined class of hardened alloys, which are common in cutlery and tool steel, the identified scale is approximately two times the grain diameter. This scale closely resembles the characteristic distance necessary for the initiation of cleavage fractures in semi-brittle and hardened metallic alloys. Consequently, the imaging scale required is approximately 20 times the grain diameter. For each pair of fractures, six overlapping images were recorded, with an overlap ratio of 50%. The acquisition of spectral representations for various wavelengths and critical features on the fracture surface was accomplished using the mathematical Fourier Transform. Subsequently, quantitative topological descriptions were devised for the image pairs by performing correlation comparisons on two spectral bands encompassing the transitional fracture scale. These frequency bands are bounded by frequencies corresponding to 2-4 and 4-8 grain diameters. Consequently, each set of fracture pairs under examination yields a total of 12 correlation values. A statistical learning tool was then formulated, employing multivariate statistical analysis methods to classify the fracture pairs based on this collection of 12 topological descriptors. This classification offers a foundation for establishing the uniqueness of forensic comparisons.  

The efficacy of the proposed statistical learning methodology was assessed using a robust training dataset and validated with a set of 38 distinct broken pairs, encompassing knives fractured in bending and stainless-steel rods with comparable grain sizes, broken under either tension or bending. The versatility of this framework was also examined across various loading conditions and on ceramic fragments. Remarkably, all broken pairs were accurately classified. This framework establishes the groundwork for forensic applications involving quantitative statistical comparisons across a wide spectrum of fractured materials, characterized by diverse textures and mechanical properties. 

Detailed Learning Objectives

  1. Attendees will understand the foundation of fracture mechanics for comparative evidence match of fractured fragments.
  2. Attendees will learn about identification of proper scales for observation, 3D imaging, and analysis of fragments.
  3. Attendees will understand the basis of statistical analysis to provide a statistical expression of the comparison and express the likelihood of a match between patterns in statistical terms that support the qualitative and quantitative judgment of the examiner. 

Presenter

  • Ashraf Bastawros, Ph.D. | T.A. Wilson Professor of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University

Funding for this Forensic Technology Center of Excellence webinar has been provided by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

All Forensic Technology Center of Excellence live webinars are hosted using Zoom Webinar. Live webinars are archived and posted on our website within two weeks of their airing. Archived webinars do not require access to the Zoom platform.

The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this webinar series are those of the presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Contact us at ForensicCOE@rti.org with any questions and subscribe to our newsletter for notifications.


Related Content

What FSSP Leaders Should Know about Artificial Intelligence and its Application to Forensic Science In-Brief

Date December 2023 Overview Artificial intelligence (AI), which leverages computers to perform tasks that enhance decision-making, problem-solving capabilities, and technology-driven innovativeness,” is a rapidly growing area of interest for both industry and the federal research and development (R&D) community.1 For forensic science service…

FLN-TWG: A Roadmap to Improve Research and Technology Transition in Forensic Science

← Back to FLN-TWG Main Page  Forensic Laboratory Needs Technology Working Group (FLN-TWG) The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), in partnership with the Forensic Technology Center of Excellence (FTCOE) at RTI International, formed the Forensic Laboratory Needs Technology Working Group…
brain, DNA, bloodstain

Human Factors in Forensic Science Practice Sourcebook

Publication Forensic Science International: Synergy, March 2022 Editors Heidi Eldridge, PhD | RTI International Barbara A. Spellman, JD, PhD | University of Virginia School of Law Thomas Busey, PhD | Indiana University, Psychological and Brain Sciences Working Group Members Paul…