Forensic Technology Center of Excellence

Introduction

Two-Pronged Study of Bullets Fired by Consecutively Rifled Barrels

Two-Pronged Study of Bullets Fired by Consecutively Rifled Barrels

← Back to Firearm and Toolmarks Webinar Series

Thursday, December 16th, 2021 | 1:00 - 2:00 PM ET
Duration: 1 hour

The 2016 PCAST (President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology) Report brought forensics, and specifically firearms identification, into the spotlight once again. According to the PCAST Report, the field lacks empirical data supporting firearms examiners' ability to determine what source (i.e., firearm) created the markings left on fired bullets and cartridge cases.

In response to this criticism, Houston Forensic Science Center (HFSC) designed a black box study using ten consecutively rifled and three nonconsecutively rifled Ruger LCP barrels. Like many consecutively rifled barrel studies, test kits consisting of known samples (i.e., test fires) and unknown bullet samples were assembled and distributed to a broad group of firearms examiners across the Unites States and internationally. In this study, four different open-set test kits were created. Participants were asked to choose one of five possible conclusions for each comparison: identification, inconclusive A (leaning toward ID), inconclusive B (neutral), inconclusive C (leaning toward elimination), or elimination. The examiners' results were used to establish (an) error rate(s) for this study.

Unlike other consecutively rifled barrel studies, HFSC incorporated 3D technology to add a second prong to this study. HFSC teamed up with Dr. Alicia Carriquiry and Dr. Heike Hofmann of the Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE). A sample of each of the four test kits was sent to Iowa State University, where the CSAFE team scanned each known and unknown bullet using a confocal light microscope. Based on these 3D scans, CSAFE researchers used a RandomForest score to establish similarity scores between the land engraved areas (LEAs) and predict source relationship between bullets. An error rate was established for this method of identifying a common source. CSAFE's similarity scores were compared to the examiners' results. The scoring of inconclusive results was of particular interest: there was no clear separation between inconclusive and elimination scores. However, there was a distinct separation of identification scores, as expected, highlighting the potential for the use of 3D technology in support of identifications in casework.

Detailed Learning Objectives:
Upon completion of this webinar, attendees will learn:
1.) The extent of subclass carry-over in consecutively rifled Ruger LCP barrels.
2.) The error rates associated when firearms examiners used traditional microscopy to identify which LCP barrel was used to fire unknown bullets.
3.) The similarity scores generated when using 3D bullet scans and application of an algorithm to identify which LCP barrel was used to fire unknown bullets.

Presenters:
Dr. Heike Hofmann | Professor in Charge, Data Science Program, Iowa State University & Associate Director, Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence
Melissa Nally | Senior Firearms Examiner, Houston Forensic Science Center

Register Here


Funding for this Forensic Technology Center of Excellence event has been provided by the National Institute of Justice.

Each of our webinars is archived within about two weeks of the live date and will be posted on our website.

Please contact us at ForensicCOE@rti.org for any questions.

Please subscribe to our newsletter for notifications.


Related Content

ammo

FLN-TWG: 3D Imaging for Firearms and Toolmarks

Forensic Laboratory Needs Technology Working Group (FLN-TWG) The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), in partnership with the Forensic Technology Center of Excellence (FTCoE) at RTI International, formed the Forensic Laboratory Needs Technology Working Group (FLN-TWG). The FLN-TWG supports NIJ’s mission…
latent print and DNA

DNA recovery after sequential processing of latent fingerprints on copy paper

Publication Journal of Forensic Sciences, September 2021 Authors Abigail S. Bathrick, M.F.S. | Bode Technology, Lorton, VA Sarah Norsworthy, M.S. | Forensic Technology Center of Excellence, RTI International, Durham, NC Dane T. Plaza, B.S. | Bode Technology, Lorton, VA Mallory…
fingerprints

Success Story: LatentSleuth: A Case Study on the Impact of Federal R&D Funding

National Institute of Justice and the Latent Print Research Community Report Date September 2021 Overview The development of technologies to improve the objective collection, analysis, and interpretation of evidence is driven by the multiple stakeholders that make up the forensic…