Forensic Technology Center of Excellence


Best Practices for Digital Image Processing

Best Practices for Digital Image Processing

This webinar originally occurred on August 5th, 2021
Duration: 1 hour

In the criminal justice community, digital images are used for scientific analysis and comparison.  Unfortunately, many digital images are not always captured with the necessary clarity required for the proper visualization of minute details. Furthermore, there may be issues with background noise and patterns that may interfere with the accurate and reliable analysis, comparison, and evaluation of the images.  Since these images are frequently used in court, they must be processed to ensure the highest level of clarity and detail possible.  In addition, there are proper procedures that must be followed to ensure their integrity and admissibility in court.

Adobe Photoshop provides a variety of tools for image processing.  Many of these tools are considered “creative” and should not be used for digitally processing forensic evidentiary photographs. For example, using Levels to eliminate grayscale values should be avoided as it may result in the loss of crucial image detail.  Furthermore, some of the techniques used in forensic digital imaging must be utilized in a specific sequence or the desired results will not be achieved. The bottom line is that processing forensic digital images with probative value is not an art.  It is a science based on sound, proven, reliable practices.

Detailed Learning Objectives:
Attendees will:
1.) Gain proficiency in the science of digital imaging and expand their knowledge of digital imaging techniques.
2.) Learn how to apply digital image processing techniques in the appropriate sequence for analysis and comparison.
3.) Be able to explain the best practices of image processing to different audiences, including other examiners, investigators, and juries.

Presenter: David “Ski” Witzke

View Archived Webinar

Funding for this Forensic Technology Center of Excellence event has been provided by the National Institute of Justice.

Please contact us at for any questions.

Please subscribe to our newsletter for notifications.

Related Content

microphone and headphones

Just Off The Shelf Forensics

In the final episode of the Case Studies season, Just Science sat down with Tim Schade and Brian Cochran to discuss off-the-shelf crime scene processing products.  Budgetary concerns often plague smaller forensic labs and law enforcement agencies. Scene investigators might realize that some of those expensive forensic tools might not be viable or…
microphone and headphones

Just Identifying Fingerprints Through Photographs

In episode six of the Case Studies season, Just Science sat down with Karen Oswald, Senior Evidence Specialist with the Suffolk County Police Department in New York, to discuss methods for identifying fingers and hands captured in evidentiary photos. As cellphone and camera technologies continue…
microphone and headphones

Just the Impact of Disturbing Media

In episode eight, Just Science interviews Dr. Kathryn Seigfried-Spellar from Purdue University about the impact of disturbing media on forensic professionals. Repeated exposure to violent and graphic media can have long-term negative effects on digital forensic examiners. Dr. Kathryn Seigfried-Spellar is researching the connection between disturbing media and the examiners who analyze it every…