Introduction

Application of the OSAC Registry of Standards to Forensic Science Service Providers’ Quality Systems

Application of the OSAC Registry of Standards to Forensic Science Service Providers’ Quality Systems

← Back to ASCLD Train the Director Series

This webinar originally occurred on March 31, 2022
Duration: 1 hour

Overview

Since its official inception in 2014, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science has advanced the mission of strengthening forensic practice by facilitating the development of technically sound, science-based standards through a formal standard developing organization (SDO) process. This is accomplished by evaluating existing standards published by SDOs for placement onto the OSAC Registry and by promoting the use of the OSAC Registry-approved standards throughout the forensic science community.

With the list of OSAC-approved standards growing, the community has rightfully turned its attention to the implementation of these standards into the quality systems of forensic laboratories. As of the drafting of this abstract, OSAC has posted 77 standards on its Registry involving 18 different forensic science disciplines, plus interdisciplinary standards. OSAC executed its first annual national OSAC Registry Implementation Survey that closed in August 2021, which indicated more than 140 forensic science service providers have already implemented standards listed on the OSAC Registry into their quality management system documents.

In September 2020, OSAC began implementing Scientific and Technical Review Panels (STRPs) with the goal of performing a critical and knowledgeable review of draft standards and providing comments and recommendations to strengthen the document. These STRP reviews add further strength and depth to original drafts produced by OSAC, ensuring a stronger work product is provided to the SDO for their formal consensus process.

This presentation will address the practical challenges facing quality managers and senior management in the process of standards implementation. The presenters will discuss how directors create a framework for implementation, access the list of current and pending standards categorized by discipline, and assign responsibilities to technical leaders. In addition, the presenters will discuss how technical leaders can be enabled to conduct gap analyses effectively, understand partial and full implementation of standards, and incorporate the necessary language in the laboratory’s quality documents.

Detailed Learning Objectives

  1. Attendees will learn how quality managers and directors can address the practical challenges they face in the process of standards implementation.
  2. Attendees will understand how directors can create a framework for implementation of standards, access the list of current and pending standards categorized by discipline, and assign responsibilities to technical leaders.
  3. Attendees will gain insight into how technical leaders can be enabled to conduct gap analyses effectively, understand partial and full implementation of standards, and incorporate the necessary language in the laboratory’s quality documents.

Presenters

  • John Paul Jones II, M.B.A. | OSAC Program Manager, National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Mark D. Stolorow, M.S., M.B.A. | Contractor, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Funding for this Forensic Technology Center of Excellence webinar has been provided by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this webinar are those of the presenter(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Contact us at ForensicCOE@rti.org with any questions and subscribe to our newsletter for notifications.


Related Content

drugs & woman

Reports of Adverse Events Associated with Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances, 2017–2020: A Review

Publication Journal of Analytical Toxicology, April 2022 Authors Amanda L A Mohr | Center for Forensic Science Research and Education Barry K Logan | Center for Forensic Science Research and EducationMelissa F Fogarty | Center for Forensic Science Research and…
brain, DNA, bloodstain

Human Factors in Forensic Science Practice Sourcebook

Publication Forensic Science International: Synergy, March 2022 Editors Heidi Eldridge, PhD | RTI International Barbara A. Spellman, JD, PhD | University of Virginia School of Law Thomas Busey, PhD | Indiana University, Psychological and Brain Sciences Working Group Members Paul…
computer

A Landscape Study of Electronic Case Management Systems for Medical Examiners and Coroners

Date February 2022 Overview Medical examiner and coroner (ME/C) offices sit at the nexus of forensic sciences and public health. These offices play a key role in the investigation of suspicious, unexplained, or unexpected deaths, dissemination of important data to…